| £16m secured for rural communities |
| Written by Ruralcity Media |
|
Thursday, 06 November 2008 12:07 |
|
SIX rural partnerships are set to receive a share of over £16 million in Yorkshire.
SIX partnerships are to receive a share of over £16 million over the next six years to support rural economic development in Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire. • £600m rural fund opens for business
Funding will help to improve rural services
The "links between actions of rural development" method of delivering rural development through a local community led approach is seen as one of the best ways of addressing rural needs. The successful groups are: the South Pennines LEADER Group; Yorkshire Dales LEADER Group; North York Moors, Coast and Hills LEADER Group; East Peak Innovation Partnership; Coast, Wolds, Wetlands and Waterways group; and the Northern Lincolnshire Rural Local Action Group. The LEADER partnerships, known as Local Action Groups, have produced Local Development Strategies to develop a range of projects that will improve the quality of life and economic prosperity of local communities. Projects will primarily focus on basic services for rural communities, rural culture and heritage, village development and renewal. The Local Action Groups are made up of local businesses, farmers, landowners, voluntary and community groups and individuals. They will play a key role in allocating the funding. The EU-wide initiative forms part of the Rural Development Programme for England (RDPE) fund which is jointly funded by Defra and the European Union, and managed by Yorkshire Forward in the Yorkshire and Humber region. "I am confident that all the LEADER Partnerships will support and develop a range of projects which will help to improve the quality of life and economic prosperity of local communities in the region." Development agencies for the neighbouring regions of north-west and north-east England are also working closely with some of the partnerships. See also:
Set as favourite
Share this
Email this
Hits: 299 Trackback(0)
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|