Sunday, 05 February 2012 10:34

'Right-to-buy' threatens housing supply

Written by  Ruralcity Media
'Right-to-buy' threatens housing supply

Government plans to revive tenants' rights to buy their council house are unlikely to work in rural areas, the government has been told.

Current proposals threaten to reduce the amount of social housing in villages and hamlets across England, said the Rural Services Network.

The warning is contained in the network's response to a government consultation on reinvigorating the right-to-buy.

Rural Services Network chief executive Graham Biggs said the government consultation had recognised the need to replace any property sold.

But he added: "We find it difficult to understand how this can be achieved in rural areas without further significant refinement to the current proposals."

The network agreed with the principle that a balance had to be struck between the level of discount and having enough receipts to fund replacement homes.

But Mr Biggs said having sufficient receipts may not be enough in itself.

He said: "The opportunities also need to exist in terms of available developable land which can be developed at reasonable cost."

The Rural Services Network was skeptical about how one-to-one replacement could work in rural areas.

Without additional funding and free/discounted land, deals were unlikely to be viable. This was seen as a huge barrier to successful application in rural areas.

In terms of public land being available to make deals work, not all public sector land would necessarily be in the right place for replacement.

Mr Biggs said one of the biggest concerns raised by network members was around the criteria that would be put on replacement dwellings.

"In rural areas, replacement properties might end up being in, say, the nearest market town rather than in the village where the original property was sold."

This would exacerbate problems for low income households to remain in their original villages, said Mr Biggs.

The government would need to consider carefully the impact on rural areas.

Exceptions may be required to ensure that the sale of rural council properties did not exacerbate the significant shortage of properties in villages.

The full network response can be downloaded here.

People in this conversation

  • Guest (Tracey)

    Report

    The people making the rules have not got a clue and as most of them are either living in ex council homes because they were lucky enough to have brought them before the restrictions were put in place. I moved 8 years to my council home was told I could buy then later found we couldn't .this is stopping young people moving in to rural area's and the young people theatre brought up in the rural area's move away because their is no one of their age and the few that do remain

    from Far Forest, Worcestershire DY14, UK
  • Guest (Tracey)

    Report

    The young that do remain stay with family because they know their is no point in accepting or trying to get a council home as when and if they can afford to buy they can't buy the council home. But I do agree that maybe if the homes that if the council sell ten homes then ten new homes should be built to match the demand for these homes

Leave your comments

0 / 500 Character restriction
Your text should be in between 10-500 characters
terms and condition.


Performance - module

Performance Benchmarking
For our latest Rural Performance Benchmarking analysis click here 
 


Our Events

Our Events
For Rural Services Network events and notable dates, click here.